Skip to content

Anthropic Proprietary Released Feb 24, 2025 Updated

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.

Model summary

  • Text #189 / 416

    248 / 1,000

    ToolsGuide Score· votes 250, tests 245

  • Vision #94 / 167

    314 / 1,000

    ToolsGuide Score· votes only

  • Price per 1M tokens

    No listed price

Summary

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is Anthropic's model, released Feb 24, 2025. It's ranked in 2 categories and does best at text: #189 of 416, with a ToolsGuide Score of 248 against a median of 235.

It also ranks #94 of 167 for vision (314).

Its vision score uses votes only, because it has published fewer than two of the tests used for that category.

It has published results on 11 tests.

Specifications

Creator
Anthropic
Licence
Proprietary
Released
Feb 24, 2025
Context window
–
Input price
–
Output price
–
Tests reported
11
Settings ranked
claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219, Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking 32K, 20250219), Claude 3.7 Sonnet (20250219)

Model comparison

Against the ten best text models.

Text score

ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better

Vision score

ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better

Input price

USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better

Leaderboards

Where Claude 3.7 Sonnet sits among the top 20 in each category.

Text

#189 of 416 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model

Full text leaderboard →

Vision

#94 of 167 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model

Full vision leaderboard →

By task

Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.

Against its nearest rivals

Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values

Text

claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219 · hover a bar for its rank

Vision

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking 32K, 20250219) · hover a bar for its rank

Test results

Every test Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.

  • GPQA

    #70 / 256

    Graduate-level science questions written to be hard to look up.

    84.8%

    Self-reported

  • AIME 2025

    #107 / 123

    Competition maths problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Exam.

    54.8%

    Self-reported

  • SWE-Bench Verified

    #69 / 120

    Fixing real bugs in real GitHub projects, checked by the projects' own tests.

    70.3%

    Self-reported

  • IFEval

    #8 / 70

    Instruction-Following Evaluation (IFEval) benchmark for large language models, focusing on verifiable instructions with 25 types of instructions and around 500 prompts containing one or more verifiable constraints

    93.2%

    Self-reported

  • MMMU

    #25 / 66

    MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.

    75.0%

    Self-reported

  • AIME 2024

    #28 / 54

    American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2024, consisting of 30 challenging mathematical reasoning problems from AIME I and AIME II competitions. Each problem requires an integer answer between 0-999 and tests advanced mathematical reasoning across algebra, geometry, combinatorics, and number theory. Used as a benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning capabilities in large language models at Olympiad-level difficulty.

    80.0%

    Self-reported

  • MMMLU

    #25 / 51

    Multilingual Massive Multitask Language Understanding dataset released by OpenAI, featuring professionally translated MMLU test questions across 14 languages including Arabic, Bengali, German, Spanish, French, Hindi, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Swahili, Yoruba, and Chinese. Contains approximately 15,908 multiple-choice questions per language covering 57 subjects.

    86.1%

    Self-reported

  • MATH-500

    #15 / 34

    MATH-500 is a subset of the MATH dataset containing 500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions. Each problem includes full step-by-step solutions and spans multiple difficulty levels across seven mathematical subjects including Prealgebra, Algebra, Number Theory, Counting and Probability, Geometry, Intermediate Algebra, and Precalculus.

    96.2%

    Self-reported

  • TAU-bench Retail

    #4 / 25

    A benchmark for evaluating tool-agent-user interaction in retail environments. Tests language agents' ability to handle dynamic conversations with users while using domain-specific API tools and following policy guidelines. Evaluates agents on tasks like order cancellations, address changes, and order status checks through multi-turn conversations.

    81.2%

    Self-reported

  • Terminal-Bench

    #14 / 25

    Terminal-Bench is a benchmark for testing AI agents in real terminal environments. It evaluates how well agents can handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, security tasks, data science workflows, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities. The benchmark consists of a dataset of ~100 hand-crafted, human-verified tasks and an execution harness that connects language models to a terminal sandbox.

    35.2%

    Self-reported

  • TAU-bench Airline

    #9 / 23

    Part of τ-bench (TAU-bench), a benchmark for Tool-Agent-User interaction in real-world domains. The airline domain evaluates language agents' ability to interact with users through dynamic conversations while following domain-specific rules and using API tools. Agents must handle airline-related tasks and policies reliably.

    58.4%

    Self-reported