Cohere cc_by_nc Released Aug 30, 2024 Updated
Command R+
ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.
Model summary
- Text #324 / 416
140 / 1,000
ToolsGuide Score· votes 141, tests 138
- Price per 1M tokens
No listed price
Summary
Command R+ is Cohere's model, released Aug 30, 2024. It's ranked in 1 category and does best at text: #324 of 416, with a ToolsGuide Score of 140 against a median of 235.
It has published results on 6 tests.
Specifications
- Creator
Cohere- Licence
- cc_by_nc
- Released
- Aug 30, 2024
- Context window
- –
- Input price
- –
- Output price
- –
- Tests reported
- 6
- Settings ranked
- command-r
Model comparison
Against the ten best text models.
Text score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Input price
USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better
Leaderboards
Where Command R+ sits among the top 20 in each category.
Text
#324 of 416 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
By task
Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.
Against its nearest rivals
Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values
-
Command R+ -
gemma-2-9b-it
-
llama-3.1-8b-instruct
Text
command-r · hover a bar for its rank
Test results
Every test Command R+ has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.
MMLU
#76 / 103Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
75.7%
Self-reported
GSM8k
#43 / 48Grade School Math 8K, a dataset of 8.5K high-quality linguistically diverse grade school math word problems requiring multi-step reasoning and elementary arithmetic operations.
70.7%
Self-reported
ARC-C
#20 / 35The AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) Challenge Set is a multiple-choice question-answering benchmark containing grade-school level science questions that require advanced reasoning capabilities. ARC-C specifically contains questions that were answered incorrectly by both retrieval-based and word co-occurrence algorithms, making it a particularly challenging subset designed to test commonsense reasoning abilities in AI systems.
71.0%
Self-reported
HellaSwag
#7 / 28A challenging commonsense natural language inference dataset that uses Adversarial Filtering to create questions trivial for humans (>95% accuracy) but difficult for state-of-the-art models, requiring completion of sentence endings based on physical situations and everyday activities
88.6%
Self-reported
Winogrande
#4 / 23WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at Scale. A large-scale dataset of 44,000 pronoun resolution problems designed to test machine commonsense reasoning. Uses adversarial filtering to reduce spurious biases and provides a more robust evaluation of whether AI systems truly understand commonsense or exploit statistical shortcuts. Current best AI methods achieve 59.4-79.1% accuracy, significantly below human performance of 94.0%.
85.4%
Self-reported
TruthfulQA
#12 / 18TruthfulQA is a benchmark to measure whether language models are truthful in generating answers to questions. It comprises 817 questions that span 38 categories, including health, law, finance and politics. The questions are crafted such that some humans would answer falsely due to a false belief or misconception, testing models' ability to avoid generating false answers learned from human texts.
56.3%
Self-reported