Skip to content

Cohere cc_by_nc Released Aug 30, 2024 Updated

Command R+

ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.

Model summary

  • Text #324 / 416

    140 / 1,000

    ToolsGuide Score· votes 141, tests 138

  • Price per 1M tokens

    No listed price

Summary

Command R+ is Cohere's model, released Aug 30, 2024. It's ranked in 1 category and does best at text: #324 of 416, with a ToolsGuide Score of 140 against a median of 235.

It has published results on 6 tests.

Specifications

Creator
Cohere
Licence
cc_by_nc
Released
Aug 30, 2024
Context window
–
Input price
–
Output price
–
Tests reported
6
Settings ranked
command-r

Model comparison

Against the ten best text models.

Text score

ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better

Input price

USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better

Leaderboards

Where Command R+ sits among the top 20 in each category.

Text

#324 of 416 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model

Full text leaderboard →

By task

Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.

Against its nearest rivals

Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values

Text

command-r · hover a bar for its rank

Test results

Every test Command R+ has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.

  • MMLU

    #76 / 103

    Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

    75.7%

    Self-reported

  • GSM8k

    #43 / 48

    Grade School Math 8K, a dataset of 8.5K high-quality linguistically diverse grade school math word problems requiring multi-step reasoning and elementary arithmetic operations.

    70.7%

    Self-reported

  • ARC-C

    #20 / 35

    The AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) Challenge Set is a multiple-choice question-answering benchmark containing grade-school level science questions that require advanced reasoning capabilities. ARC-C specifically contains questions that were answered incorrectly by both retrieval-based and word co-occurrence algorithms, making it a particularly challenging subset designed to test commonsense reasoning abilities in AI systems.

    71.0%

    Self-reported

  • HellaSwag

    #7 / 28

    A challenging commonsense natural language inference dataset that uses Adversarial Filtering to create questions trivial for humans (>95% accuracy) but difficult for state-of-the-art models, requiring completion of sentence endings based on physical situations and everyday activities

    88.6%

    Self-reported

  • Winogrande

    #4 / 23

    WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at Scale. A large-scale dataset of 44,000 pronoun resolution problems designed to test machine commonsense reasoning. Uses adversarial filtering to reduce spurious biases and provides a more robust evaluation of whether AI systems truly understand commonsense or exploit statistical shortcuts. Current best AI methods achieve 59.4-79.1% accuracy, significantly below human performance of 94.0%.

    85.4%

    Self-reported

  • TruthfulQA

    #12 / 18

    TruthfulQA is a benchmark to measure whether language models are truthful in generating answers to questions. It comprises 817 questions that span 38 categories, including health, law, finance and politics. The questions are crafted such that some humans would answer falsely due to a false belief or misconception, testing models' ability to avoid generating false answers learned from human texts.

    56.3%

    Self-reported