Google Proprietary Released Mar 15, 2024 Updated
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.
Model summary
- Vision #139 / 167
190 / 1,000
ToolsGuide Score· votes 188, tests 192
- Price per 1M tokens
No listed price
Summary
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is Google's model, released Mar 15, 2024. It's ranked in 1 category and does best at vision: #139 of 167, with a ToolsGuide Score of 190 against a median of 346.
It has published results on 13 tests.
Specifications
- Creator
Google
- Licence
- Proprietary
- Released
- Mar 15, 2024
- Context window
- –
- Input price
- –
- Output price
- –
- Tests reported
- 13
- Settings ranked
- Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B (001)
Model comparison
Against the ten best vision models.
Vision score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Input price
USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better
Leaderboards
Where Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B sits among the top 20 in each category.
Vision
#139 of 167 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
By task
Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.
Vision
Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B (001) · hover a bar for its rank
Test results
Every test Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.
GPQA
#230 / 256Graduate-level science questions written to be hard to look up.
38.4%
Self-reported
MMLU-Pro
#116 / 142Broad knowledge and reasoning across 14 subjects, ten answer choices each.
58.7%
Self-reported
MATH
#50 / 71MATH dataset contains 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions. Each problem includes full step-by-step solutions and spans multiple difficulty levels (1-5) across seven mathematical subjects including Prealgebra, Algebra, Number Theory, Counting and Probability, Geometry, Intermediate Algebra, and Precalculus.
58.7%
Self-reported
MMMU
#56 / 66MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.
53.7%
Self-reported
MathVista
#33 / 40MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.
54.7%
Self-reported
Video-MME
#16 / 17Video-MME is the first-ever comprehensive evaluation benchmark of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in video analysis. It features 900 videos totaling 254 hours with 2,700 human-annotated question-answer pairs across 6 primary visual domains (Knowledge, Film & Television, Sports Competition, Life Record, Multilingual, and others) and 30 subfields. The benchmark evaluates models across diverse temporal dimensions (11 seconds to 1 hour), integrates multi-modal inputs including video frames, subtitles, and audio, and uses rigorous manual labeling by expert annotators for precise assessment.
66.2%
Self-reported
HiddenMath
#10 / 13Google DeepMind's internal mathematical reasoning benchmark that introduces novel problems not encountered during model training to evaluate true mathematical reasoning capabilities rather than memorization
32.8%
Self-reported
Natural2Code
#6 / 8NaturalCodeBench (NCB) is a challenging code benchmark designed to mirror the complexity and variety of real-world coding tasks. It comprises 402 high-quality problems in Python and Java, selected from natural user queries from online coding services, covering 6 different domains.
75.5%
Self-reported
Vibe-Eval
#8 / 8VIBE-Eval is a hard evaluation suite for measuring progress of multimodal language models, consisting of 269 visual understanding prompts with gold-standard responses authored by experts. The benchmark has dual objectives: vibe checking multimodal chat models for day-to-day tasks and rigorously testing frontier models, with the hard set containing >50% questions that all frontier models answer incorrectly.
40.9%
Self-reported
MRCR
#5 / 7MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) is a synthetic long-context reasoning task where models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs. It tests the ability to distinguish between similar requests and reason about ordering while maintaining attention across extended contexts.
54.7%
Self-reported
FLEURS
#6 / 6Few-shot Learning Evaluation of Universal Representations of Speech - a parallel speech dataset in 102 languages built on FLoRes-101 with approximately 12 hours of speech supervision per language for tasks including ASR, speech language identification, translation and retrieval. Scores are shown as speech recognition accuracy (1 - word error rate), so higher is better.
86.4%
Self-reported
WMT23
#3 / 4The Eighth Conference on Machine Translation (WMT23) benchmark evaluating machine translation systems across 8 language pairs (14 translation directions) including general, biomedical, literary, and low-resource language translation tasks. Features specialized shared tasks for quality estimation, metrics evaluation, sign language translation, and discourse-level literary translation with professional human assessment.
72.6%
Self-reported
XSTest
#4 / 4XSTest is a test suite designed to identify exaggerated safety behaviours in large language models. It comprises 450 prompts: 250 safe prompts across ten prompt types that well-calibrated models should not refuse to comply with, and 200 unsafe prompts as contrasts that models should refuse. The benchmark systematically evaluates whether models refuse to respond to clearly safe prompts due to overly cautious safety mechanisms.
92.6%
Self-reported