Skip to content

Google Proprietary Released Jul 21, 2026 Updated

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.

Model summary

  • Text #70 / 416

    433 / 1,000

    ToolsGuide Score· votes only

  • Vision #40 / 167

    490 / 1,000

    ToolsGuide Score· votes only

  • Coding #89 / 147

    291 / 1,000

    ToolsGuide Score· votes 308, tests 268

  • Price per 1M tokens

    In $0.30· Out $2.50

    $0.30

    Input · median text model $0.43

Summary

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is Google's model, released Jul 21, 2026. It's ranked in 3 categories and does best at text: #70 of 416, with a ToolsGuide Score of 433 against a median of 235.

It also ranks #40 of 167 for vision (490), #89 of 147 for coding (291).

Its text and vision score uses votes only, because it has published fewer than two of the tests used for those categories.

It costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens, below the median text model ($0.43).

It has published results on 6 tests.

Specifications

Creator
Google
Licence
Proprietary
Released
Jul 21, 2026
Context window
1M tokens
Input price
$0.30 / 1M
Output price
$2.50 / 1M
Tests reported
6
Settings ranked
gemini-3.5-flash-lite, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Model comparison

Against the ten best text models.

Text score

ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better

Vision score

ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better

Input price

USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better

Leaderboards

Where Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite sits among the top 20 in each category.

Text

#70 of 416 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model

Full text leaderboard →

Vision

#40 of 167 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model

Full vision leaderboard →

Coding

#89 of 147 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model

Full coding leaderboard →

By task

Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.

Score against price

Text · the 10 priced models ranked closest · up and to the left is better value

Against its nearest rivals

Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values

Text

gemini-3.5-flash-lite · hover a bar for its rank

Vision

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · hover a bar for its rank

Coding

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · hover a bar for its rank

Test results

Every test Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.

  • SWE-Bench Pro

    #45 / 61

    Harder, longer software engineering tasks from real codebases.

    54.2%

    Self-reported · In the coding score

  • CharXiv-R

    #40 / 60

    Reading and reasoning about charts from scientific papers.

    76.5%

    Self-reported

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1

    #40 / 46

    Terminal-Bench 2.1 is an updated release of the Terminal-Bench benchmark that tests AI agents' ability to operate a computer via the terminal. It evaluates how well models handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, data science workflows, and security tasks.

    54.0%

    Self-reported

  • MRCR v2 (8-needle)

    #26 / 32

    MRCR v2 (8-needle) is a variant of the Multi-Round Coreference Resolution benchmark that includes 8 needle items to retrieve from long contexts. This tests models' ability to simultaneously track and reason about multiple pieces of information across extended conversations.

    21.3%

    Self-reported · In the text score

  • OSWorld-Verified

    #16 / 28

    OSWorld-Verified is a verified subset of OSWorld, a scalable real computer environment for multimodal agents supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS.

    74.0%

    Self-reported

  • MLE-Bench

    #2 / 2

    MLE-Bench evaluates AI agents on machine learning engineering tasks by measuring their performance on Kaggle competitions.

    39.2%

    Unverified