Google gemma Released Mar 12, 2025 Updated
Gemma 3 12B
ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.
Model summary
- Text #268 / 416
185 / 1,000
ToolsGuide Score· votes 214, tests 164
- Price per 1M tokens
In $0.05· Out $0.15
$0.05
Input · median text model $0.43
Summary
Gemma 3 12B is Google's model, released Mar 12, 2025. It's ranked in 1 category and does best at text: #268 of 416, with a ToolsGuide Score of 185 against a median of 235.
It costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens, below the median text model ($0.43).
It has published results on 26 tests and has the top score on 1 of them, including VQAv2 (val).
Specifications
- Creator
Google
- Licence
- gemma
- Released
- Mar 12, 2025
- Context window
- 131K tokens
- Input price
- $0.05 / 1M
- Output price
- $0.15 / 1M
- Tests reported
- 26
- Settings ranked
- gemma-3-12b-it
Model comparison
Against the ten best text models.
Text score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Input price
USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better
Leaderboards
Where Gemma 3 12B sits among the top 20 in each category.
Text
#268 of 416 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
By task
Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.
Score against price
Text · the 10 priced models ranked closest · up and to the left is better value
Against its nearest rivals
Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values
-
Gemma 3 12B
-
qwen2.5-72b-instruct
-
claude-3-5-haiku-20241022
Text
gemma-3-12b-it · hover a bar for its rank
Test results
Every test Gemma 3 12B has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.
GPQA
#225 / 256Graduate-level science questions written to be hard to look up.
40.9%
Self-reported
MMLU-Pro
#114 / 142Broad knowledge and reasoning across 14 subjects, ten answer choices each.
60.6%
Self-reported
LiveCodeBench
#68 / 76LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.
24.6%
Self-reported
MATH
#14 / 71MATH dataset contains 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions. Each problem includes full step-by-step solutions and spans multiple difficulty levels (1-5) across seven mathematical subjects including Prealgebra, Algebra, Number Theory, Counting and Probability, Geometry, Intermediate Algebra, and Precalculus.
83.8%
Self-reported
IFEval
#24 / 70Instruction-Following Evaluation (IFEval) benchmark for large language models, focusing on verifiable instructions with 25 types of instructions and around 500 prompts containing one or more verifiable constraints
88.9%
Self-reported
HumanEval
#34 / 66A benchmark that measures functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, consisting of 164 original programming problems assessing language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics
85.4%
Self-reported
GSM8k
#16 / 48Grade School Math 8K, a dataset of 8.5K high-quality linguistically diverse grade school math word problems requiring multi-step reasoning and elementary arithmetic operations.
94.4%
Self-reported
SimpleQA
#43 / 47SimpleQA is a factuality benchmark developed by OpenAI that measures the short-form factual accuracy of large language models. The benchmark contains 4,326 short, fact-seeking questions that are adversarially collected and designed to have single, indisputable answers. Questions cover diverse topics from science and technology to entertainment, and the benchmark also measures model calibration by evaluating whether models know what they know.
6.3%
Self-reported
AI2D
#26 / 35AI2D is a dataset of 4,903 illustrative diagrams from grade school natural sciences (such as food webs, human physiology, and life cycles) with over 15,000 multiple choice questions and answers. The benchmark evaluates diagram understanding and visual reasoning capabilities, requiring models to interpret diagrammatic elements, relationships, and structure to answer questions about scientific concepts represented in visual form.
84.2%
Self-reported
MBPP
#21 / 33MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) is a benchmark of 974 crowd-sourced Python programming problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers. Each problem consists of a task description, code solution, and 3 automated test cases covering programming fundamentals and standard library functionality.
0.7%
Self-reported
DocVQA
#24 / 28A dataset for Visual Question Answering on document images containing 50,000 questions defined on 12,000+ document images. The benchmark tests AI's ability to understand document structure and content, requiring models to comprehend document layout and perform information retrieval to answer questions about document images.
87.1%
Self-reported
ChartQA
#25 / 26ChartQA is a large-scale benchmark comprising 9.6K human-written questions and 23.1K questions generated from human-written chart summaries, designed to evaluate models' abilities in visual and logical reasoning over charts.
75.7%
Self-reported
MathVista-Mini
#25 / 26MathVista-Mini is a smaller version of the MathVista benchmark that evaluates mathematical reasoning in visual contexts. It consists of examples derived from multimodal datasets involving mathematics, combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess foundation models' ability to solve problems requiring both visual understanding and mathematical reasoning.
62.9%
Self-reported
WMT24++
#16 / 24WMT24++ is a comprehensive multilingual machine translation benchmark that expands the WMT24 dataset to cover 55 languages and dialects. It includes human-written references and post-edits across four domains (literary, news, social, and speech) to evaluate machine translation systems and large language models across diverse linguistic contexts.
51.6%
Self-reported
BIG-Bench Hard
#6 / 21BIG-Bench Hard (BBH) is a subset of 23 challenging BIG-Bench tasks selected because prior language model evaluations did not outperform average human-rater performance. The benchmark contains 6,511 evaluation examples testing various forms of multi-step reasoning including arithmetic, logical reasoning (Boolean expressions, logical deduction), geometric reasoning, temporal reasoning, and language understanding. Tasks require capabilities such as causal judgment, object counting, navigation, pattern recognition, and complex problem solving.
85.7%
Self-reported
FACTS Grounding
#10 / 20A benchmark evaluating language models' ability to generate factually accurate and well-grounded responses based on long-form input context, comprising 1,719 examples with documents up to 32k tokens requiring detailed responses that are fully grounded in provided documents
75.8%
Self-reported
Global-MMLU-Lite
#9 / 16A lightweight version of Global MMLU benchmark that evaluates language models across multiple languages while addressing cultural and linguistic biases in multilingual evaluation.
69.5%
Self-reported
TextVQA
#14 / 16TextVQA contains 45,336 questions on 28,408 images that require reasoning about text to answer. Introduced to benchmark VQA models' ability to read and reason about text within images, particularly for assistive technologies for visually impaired users. The dataset addresses the gap where existing VQA datasets had few text-based questions or were too small.
67.7%
Self-reported
HiddenMath
#4 / 13Google DeepMind's internal mathematical reasoning benchmark that introduces novel problems not encountered during model training to evaluate true mathematical reasoning capabilities rather than memorization
54.5%
Self-reported
MMMU (val)
#10 / 13Validation set of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark. Features college-level multimodal questions across 6 core disciplines (Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, Tech & Engineering) spanning 30 subjects and 183 subfields with diverse image types including charts, diagrams, maps, and tables.
59.6%
Self-reported
BIG-Bench Extra Hard
#8 / 11BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH) is a challenging benchmark that replaces each task in BIG-Bench Hard with a novel task that probes similar reasoning capabilities but exhibits significantly increased difficulty. The benchmark contains 23 tasks testing diverse reasoning skills including many-hop reasoning, causal understanding, spatial reasoning, temporal arithmetic, geometric reasoning, linguistic reasoning, logic puzzles, and humor understanding. Designed to address saturation on existing benchmarks where state-of-the-art models achieve near-perfect scores, BBEH shows substantial room for improvement with best models achieving only 9.8-44.8% average accuracy.
16.3%
Self-reported
InfoVQA
#9 / 10InfoVQA dataset with 30,000 questions and 5,000 infographic images requiring joint reasoning over document layout, textual content, graphical elements, and data visualizations with elementary reasoning and arithmetic skills
64.9%
Self-reported
Bird-SQL (dev)
#4 / 9BIRD (BIg Bench for LaRge-scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs) is a comprehensive text-to-SQL benchmark containing 12,751 question-SQL pairs across 95 databases (33.4 GB total) spanning 37+ professional domains. It evaluates large language models' ability to convert natural language to executable SQL queries in real-world scenarios with complex database schemas and dirty data.
47.9%
Self-reported
ECLeKTic
#3 / 8A multilingual closed-book question answering dataset that evaluates cross-lingual knowledge transfer in large language models across 12 languages, using knowledge-seeking questions based on Wikipedia articles that exist only in one language
10.3%
Self-reported
Natural2Code
#4 / 8NaturalCodeBench (NCB) is a challenging code benchmark designed to mirror the complexity and variety of real-world coding tasks. It comprises 402 high-quality problems in Python and Java, selected from natural user queries from online coding services, covering 6 different domains.
80.7%
Self-reported
VQAv2 (val)
#1 / 3VQAv2 is a balanced Visual Question Answering dataset containing open-ended questions about images that require understanding of vision, language, and commonsense knowledge to answer. VQAv2 addresses bias issues from the original VQA dataset by collecting complementary images such that every question is associated with similar images that result in different answers, forcing models to actually understand visual content rather than relying on language priors.
71.6%
Self-reported