Skip to content

Google gemma Released Mar 12, 2025 Updated

Gemma 3 12B

ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.

Model summary

  • Text #268 / 416

    185 / 1,000

    ToolsGuide Score· votes 214, tests 164

  • Price per 1M tokens

    In $0.05· Out $0.15

    $0.05

    Input · median text model $0.43

Summary

Gemma 3 12B is Google's model, released Mar 12, 2025. It's ranked in 1 category and does best at text: #268 of 416, with a ToolsGuide Score of 185 against a median of 235.

It costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens, below the median text model ($0.43).

It has published results on 26 tests and has the top score on 1 of them, including VQAv2 (val).

Specifications

Creator
Google
Licence
gemma
Released
Mar 12, 2025
Context window
131K tokens
Input price
$0.05 / 1M
Output price
$0.15 / 1M
Tests reported
26
Settings ranked
gemma-3-12b-it

Model comparison

Against the ten best text models.

Text score

ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better

Input price

USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better

Leaderboards

Where Gemma 3 12B sits among the top 20 in each category.

Text

#268 of 416 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model

Full text leaderboard →

By task

Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.

Score against price

Text · the 10 priced models ranked closest · up and to the left is better value

Against its nearest rivals

Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values

Text

gemma-3-12b-it · hover a bar for its rank

Test results

Every test Gemma 3 12B has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.

  • GPQA

    #225 / 256

    Graduate-level science questions written to be hard to look up.

    40.9%

    Self-reported

  • MMLU-Pro

    #114 / 142

    Broad knowledge and reasoning across 14 subjects, ten answer choices each.

    60.6%

    Self-reported

  • LiveCodeBench

    #68 / 76

    LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.

    24.6%

    Self-reported

  • MATH

    #14 / 71

    MATH dataset contains 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions. Each problem includes full step-by-step solutions and spans multiple difficulty levels (1-5) across seven mathematical subjects including Prealgebra, Algebra, Number Theory, Counting and Probability, Geometry, Intermediate Algebra, and Precalculus.

    83.8%

    Self-reported

  • IFEval

    #24 / 70

    Instruction-Following Evaluation (IFEval) benchmark for large language models, focusing on verifiable instructions with 25 types of instructions and around 500 prompts containing one or more verifiable constraints

    88.9%

    Self-reported

  • HumanEval

    #34 / 66

    A benchmark that measures functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, consisting of 164 original programming problems assessing language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics

    85.4%

    Self-reported

  • GSM8k

    #16 / 48

    Grade School Math 8K, a dataset of 8.5K high-quality linguistically diverse grade school math word problems requiring multi-step reasoning and elementary arithmetic operations.

    94.4%

    Self-reported

  • SimpleQA

    #43 / 47

    SimpleQA is a factuality benchmark developed by OpenAI that measures the short-form factual accuracy of large language models. The benchmark contains 4,326 short, fact-seeking questions that are adversarially collected and designed to have single, indisputable answers. Questions cover diverse topics from science and technology to entertainment, and the benchmark also measures model calibration by evaluating whether models know what they know.

    6.3%

    Self-reported

  • AI2D

    #26 / 35

    AI2D is a dataset of 4,903 illustrative diagrams from grade school natural sciences (such as food webs, human physiology, and life cycles) with over 15,000 multiple choice questions and answers. The benchmark evaluates diagram understanding and visual reasoning capabilities, requiring models to interpret diagrammatic elements, relationships, and structure to answer questions about scientific concepts represented in visual form.

    84.2%

    Self-reported

  • MBPP

    #21 / 33

    MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) is a benchmark of 974 crowd-sourced Python programming problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers. Each problem consists of a task description, code solution, and 3 automated test cases covering programming fundamentals and standard library functionality.

    0.7%

    Self-reported

  • DocVQA

    #24 / 28

    A dataset for Visual Question Answering on document images containing 50,000 questions defined on 12,000+ document images. The benchmark tests AI's ability to understand document structure and content, requiring models to comprehend document layout and perform information retrieval to answer questions about document images.

    87.1%

    Self-reported

  • ChartQA

    #25 / 26

    ChartQA is a large-scale benchmark comprising 9.6K human-written questions and 23.1K questions generated from human-written chart summaries, designed to evaluate models' abilities in visual and logical reasoning over charts.

    75.7%

    Self-reported

  • MathVista-Mini

    #25 / 26

    MathVista-Mini is a smaller version of the MathVista benchmark that evaluates mathematical reasoning in visual contexts. It consists of examples derived from multimodal datasets involving mathematics, combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess foundation models' ability to solve problems requiring both visual understanding and mathematical reasoning.

    62.9%

    Self-reported

  • WMT24++

    #16 / 24

    WMT24++ is a comprehensive multilingual machine translation benchmark that expands the WMT24 dataset to cover 55 languages and dialects. It includes human-written references and post-edits across four domains (literary, news, social, and speech) to evaluate machine translation systems and large language models across diverse linguistic contexts.

    51.6%

    Self-reported

  • BIG-Bench Hard

    #6 / 21

    BIG-Bench Hard (BBH) is a subset of 23 challenging BIG-Bench tasks selected because prior language model evaluations did not outperform average human-rater performance. The benchmark contains 6,511 evaluation examples testing various forms of multi-step reasoning including arithmetic, logical reasoning (Boolean expressions, logical deduction), geometric reasoning, temporal reasoning, and language understanding. Tasks require capabilities such as causal judgment, object counting, navigation, pattern recognition, and complex problem solving.

    85.7%

    Self-reported

  • FACTS Grounding

    #10 / 20

    A benchmark evaluating language models' ability to generate factually accurate and well-grounded responses based on long-form input context, comprising 1,719 examples with documents up to 32k tokens requiring detailed responses that are fully grounded in provided documents

    75.8%

    Self-reported

  • Global-MMLU-Lite

    #9 / 16

    A lightweight version of Global MMLU benchmark that evaluates language models across multiple languages while addressing cultural and linguistic biases in multilingual evaluation.

    69.5%

    Self-reported

  • TextVQA

    #14 / 16

    TextVQA contains 45,336 questions on 28,408 images that require reasoning about text to answer. Introduced to benchmark VQA models' ability to read and reason about text within images, particularly for assistive technologies for visually impaired users. The dataset addresses the gap where existing VQA datasets had few text-based questions or were too small.

    67.7%

    Self-reported

  • HiddenMath

    #4 / 13

    Google DeepMind's internal mathematical reasoning benchmark that introduces novel problems not encountered during model training to evaluate true mathematical reasoning capabilities rather than memorization

    54.5%

    Self-reported

  • MMMU (val)

    #10 / 13

    Validation set of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark. Features college-level multimodal questions across 6 core disciplines (Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, Tech & Engineering) spanning 30 subjects and 183 subfields with diverse image types including charts, diagrams, maps, and tables.

    59.6%

    Self-reported

  • BIG-Bench Extra Hard

    #8 / 11

    BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH) is a challenging benchmark that replaces each task in BIG-Bench Hard with a novel task that probes similar reasoning capabilities but exhibits significantly increased difficulty. The benchmark contains 23 tasks testing diverse reasoning skills including many-hop reasoning, causal understanding, spatial reasoning, temporal arithmetic, geometric reasoning, linguistic reasoning, logic puzzles, and humor understanding. Designed to address saturation on existing benchmarks where state-of-the-art models achieve near-perfect scores, BBEH shows substantial room for improvement with best models achieving only 9.8-44.8% average accuracy.

    16.3%

    Self-reported

  • InfoVQA

    #9 / 10

    InfoVQA dataset with 30,000 questions and 5,000 infographic images requiring joint reasoning over document layout, textual content, graphical elements, and data visualizations with elementary reasoning and arithmetic skills

    64.9%

    Self-reported

  • Bird-SQL (dev)

    #4 / 9

    BIRD (BIg Bench for LaRge-scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs) is a comprehensive text-to-SQL benchmark containing 12,751 question-SQL pairs across 95 databases (33.4 GB total) spanning 37+ professional domains. It evaluates large language models' ability to convert natural language to executable SQL queries in real-world scenarios with complex database schemas and dirty data.

    47.9%

    Self-reported

  • ECLeKTic

    #3 / 8

    A multilingual closed-book question answering dataset that evaluates cross-lingual knowledge transfer in large language models across 12 languages, using knowledge-seeking questions based on Wikipedia articles that exist only in one language

    10.3%

    Self-reported

  • Natural2Code

    #4 / 8

    NaturalCodeBench (NCB) is a challenging code benchmark designed to mirror the complexity and variety of real-world coding tasks. It comprises 402 high-quality problems in Python and Java, selected from natural user queries from online coding services, covering 6 different domains.

    80.7%

    Self-reported

  • VQAv2 (val)

    #1 / 3

    VQAv2 is a balanced Visual Question Answering dataset containing open-ended questions about images that require understanding of vision, language, and commonsense knowledge to answer. VQAv2 addresses bias issues from the original VQA dataset by collecting complementary images such that every question is associated with similar images that result in different answers, forcing models to actually understand visual content rather than relying on language priors.

    71.6%

    Self-reported