Z.ai mit Released Jan 19, 2026 Updated
GLM-4.7-Flash
ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.
Model summary
- Text #182 / 416
262 / 1,000
ToolsGuide Score· votes 239, tests 289
- Price per 1M tokens
No listed price
Summary
GLM-4.7-Flash is Z.ai's model, released Jan 19, 2026. It's ranked in 1 category and does best at text: #182 of 416, with a ToolsGuide Score of 262 against a median of 235.
It has published results on 6 tests.
Specifications
- Creator
Z.ai- Licence
- mit
- Released
- Jan 19, 2026
- Context window
- –
- Input price
- –
- Output price
- –
- Tests reported
- 6
- Settings ranked
- glm-4.7-flash
Model comparison
Against the ten best text models.
Text score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Input price
USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better
Leaderboards
Where GLM-4.7-Flash sits among the top 20 in each category.
Text
#182 of 416 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
By task
Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.
Against its nearest rivals
Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values
-
GLM-4.7-Flash -
claude-sonnet-4-20250514 -
qwen3-32b
Text
glm-4.7-flash · hover a bar for its rank
Test results
Every test GLM-4.7-Flash has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.
GPQA
#122 / 256Graduate-level science questions written to be hard to look up.
75.2%
Self-reported
AIME 2025
#43 / 123Competition maths problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Exam.
91.6%
Self-reported
SWE-Bench Verified
#93 / 120Fixing real bugs in real GitHub projects, checked by the projects' own tests.
59.2%
Self-reported
Humanity's Last Exam
#87 / 108Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions
14.4%
Self-reported · In the text score· In the vision score
BrowseComp
#60 / 68Finding hard-to-locate facts by browsing the web.
42.8%
Self-reported · In the agents score
Tau-bench
#4 / 6τ-bench: A benchmark for tool-agent-user interaction in real-world domains. Tests language agents' ability to interact with users and follow domain-specific rules through dynamic conversations using API tools and policy guidelines across retail and airline domains. Evaluates consistency and reliability of agent behavior over multiple trials.
79.5%
Self-reported