Skip to content

Z.ai Proprietary Released Apr 2, 2026 Updated

GLM-5V-Turbo

ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.

Model summary

  • Text #104 / 416

    370 / 1,000

    ToolsGuide Score· votes only

  • Vision #76 / 167

    388 / 1,000

    ToolsGuide Score· votes only

  • Coding #92 / 147

    284 / 1,000

    ToolsGuide Score· votes only

  • Price per 1M tokens

    No listed price

Summary

GLM-5V-Turbo is Z.ai's model, released Apr 2, 2026. It's ranked in 3 categories and does best at text: #104 of 416, with a ToolsGuide Score of 370 against a median of 235.

It also ranks #76 of 167 for vision (388), #92 of 147 for coding (284).

Its text and vision and coding score uses votes only, because it has published fewer than two of the tests used for those categories.

It has published results on 19 tests and has the top score on 9 of them, including Design2Code and BrowseComp-VL.

Specifications

Creator
Z.ai
Licence
Proprietary
Released
Apr 2, 2026
Context window
–
Input price
–
Output price
–
Tests reported
19
Settings ranked
glm-5v-turbo, GLM-5V-Turbo

Model comparison

Against the ten best text models.

Text score

ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better

Vision score

ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better

Input price

USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better

Leaderboards

Where GLM-5V-Turbo sits among the top 20 in each category.

Text

#104 of 416 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model

Full text leaderboard →

Vision

#76 of 167 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model

Full vision leaderboard →

Coding

#92 of 147 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model

Full coding leaderboard →

By task

Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.

Against its nearest rivals

Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values

Text

glm-5v-turbo · hover a bar for its rank

Vision

GLM-5V-Turbo · hover a bar for its rank

Coding

GLM-5V-Turbo · hover a bar for its rank

Test results

Every test GLM-5V-Turbo has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.

  • OSWorld

    #7 / 21

    OSWorld: The first-of-its-kind scalable, real computer environment for multimodal agents, supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS with 369 computer tasks involving real web and desktop applications, OS file I/O, and multi-application workflows

    62.3%

    Self-reported

  • FACTS Grounding

    #17 / 20

    A benchmark evaluating language models' ability to generate factually accurate and well-grounded responses based on long-form input context, comprising 1,719 examples with documents up to 32k tokens requiring detailed responses that are fully grounded in provided documents

    58.6%

    Self-reported

  • SimpleVQA

    #3 / 17

    SimpleVQA is a visual question answering benchmark focused on simple queries.

    0.8%

    Self-reported

  • Claw-Eval

    #2 / 14

    Claw-Eval tests real-world agentic task completion across complex multi-step scenarios, evaluating a model's ability to use tools, navigate environments, and complete end-to-end tasks autonomously.

    75.0%

    Self-reported

  • AndroidWorld

    #6 / 8

    AndroidWorld evaluates an agent's ability to operate in real Android GUI environments, completing multi-step tasks by perceiving screen content and executing touch/type actions.

    75.7%

    Self-reported

  • PinchBench

    #6 / 7

    PinchBench evaluates coding agents on real-world agentic coding tasks, measuring both best-case and average performance across complex software engineering scenarios.

    80.7%

    Self-reported

  • V*

    #7 / 7

    A visual reasoning benchmark evaluating multimodal inference under challenging spatial and grounded tasks.

    89.0%

    Self-reported

  • Vision2Web

    #5 / 5

    Vision2Web evaluates multimodal models on converting visual designs and screenshots into functional web pages, measuring end-to-end design-to-code capability.

    31.0%

    Self-reported

  • ZClawBench

    #2 / 4

    ZClawBench evaluates Claw-style agent task execution quality, measuring a model's ability to autonomously complete complex multi-step coding tasks in real-world environments.

    57.6%

    Self-reported

  • Design2Code

    #1 / 2

    Design2Code evaluates the ability to generate code (HTML/CSS/JS) from visual designs.

    0.9%

    Unverified

  • MMSearch-Plus

    #2 / 2

    MMSearch-Plus is an extended variant of MMSearch with harder multimodal search and retrieval tasks requiring deeper reasoning over visual and textual search results.

    30.0%

    Unverified

  • BrowseComp-VL

    #1 / 1

    BrowseComp-VL is the vision-language variant of BrowseComp, evaluating multimodal models on web browsing comprehension tasks that require processing visual web page content alongside text.

    51.9%

    Unverified

  • CC-Bench-V2 Backend

    #1 / 1

    CC-Bench-V2 Backend evaluates coding agents on backend development tasks, measuring practical engineering ability to implement server-side logic, APIs, and system components.

    22.8%

    Unverified

  • CC-Bench-V2 Frontend

    #1 / 1

    CC-Bench-V2 Frontend evaluates coding agents on frontend development tasks, measuring ability to build UI components, handle styling, and implement client-side logic.

    68.4%

    Unverified

  • CC-Bench-V2 Repo Exploration

    #1 / 1

    CC-Bench-V2 Repo Exploration evaluates coding agents on repository-level understanding and navigation, measuring ability to explore, comprehend, and work across entire codebases.

    72.2%

    Unverified

  • Flame-VLM-Code

    #1 / 1

    Flame-VLM-Code evaluates multimodal models on visual code generation tasks, measuring ability to generate code from visual inputs such as UI mockups and design specifications.

    93.8%

    Unverified

  • ImageMining

    #1 / 1

    ImageMining evaluates multimodal models on extracting structured information from images using tool use, measuring ability to combine visual understanding with tool-based retrieval and analysis.

    30.7%

    Unverified

  • MMSearch

    #1 / 1

    MMSearch evaluates multimodal models on search-based retrieval and question answering tasks that require processing both visual and textual information from search results.

    72.9%

    Unverified

  • WebVoyager

    #1 / 1

    WebVoyager evaluates an agent's ability to navigate and complete tasks on real websites by perceiving page screenshots and executing browser actions.

    88.5%

    Unverified