Skip to content

OpenAI Proprietary Released Jul 18, 2024 Updated

GPT-4o mini

ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.

Model summary

  • Text #276 / 416

    180 / 1,000

    ToolsGuide Score· votes 192, tests 170

  • Vision #134 / 167

    206 / 1,000

    ToolsGuide Score· votes 207, tests 204

  • Price per 1M tokens

    No listed price

Summary

GPT-4o mini is OpenAI's model, released Jul 18, 2024. It's ranked in 2 categories and does best at text: #276 of 416, with a ToolsGuide Score of 180 against a median of 235.

It also ranks #134 of 167 for vision (206).

It has published results on 9 tests.

Specifications

Creator
OpenAI
Licence
Proprietary
Released
Jul 18, 2024
Context window
–
Input price
–
Output price
–
Tests reported
9
Settings ranked
gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18, GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)

Model comparison

Against the ten best text models.

Text score

ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better

Vision score

ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better

Input price

USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better

Leaderboards

Where GPT-4o mini sits among the top 20 in each category.

Text

#276 of 416 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model

Full text leaderboard →

Vision

#134 of 167 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model

Full vision leaderboard →

By task

Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.

Against its nearest rivals

Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values

Text

gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18 · hover a bar for its rank

Vision

GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18) · hover a bar for its rank

Test results

Every test GPT-4o mini has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.

  • GPQA

    #228 / 256

    Graduate-level science questions written to be hard to look up.

    40.2%

    Self-reported

  • SWE-Bench Verified

    #120 / 120

    Fixing real bugs in real GitHub projects, checked by the projects' own tests.

    8.7%

    Self-reported

  • MMLU

    #52 / 103

    Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

    82.0%

    Self-reported

  • MATH

    #38 / 71

    MATH dataset contains 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions. Each problem includes full step-by-step solutions and spans multiple difficulty levels (1-5) across seven mathematical subjects including Prealgebra, Algebra, Number Theory, Counting and Probability, Geometry, Intermediate Algebra, and Precalculus.

    70.2%

    Self-reported

  • HumanEval

    #29 / 66

    A benchmark that measures functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, consisting of 164 original programming problems assessing language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics

    87.2%

    Self-reported

  • MMMU

    #48 / 66

    MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.

    59.4%

    Self-reported

  • MathVista

    #31 / 40

    MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.

    56.7%

    Self-reported

  • MGSM

    #13 / 31

    MGSM (Multilingual Grade School Math) is a benchmark of grade-school math problems. Contains 250 grade-school math problems manually translated from the GSM8K dataset into ten typologically diverse languages: Spanish, French, German, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Swahili, Bengali, and Telugu. Evaluates multilingual mathematical reasoning capabilities.

    87.0%

    Self-reported

  • DROP

    #13 / 30

    DROP (Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs) is a reading comprehension benchmark requiring discrete reasoning over paragraph content. It contains crowdsourced, adversarially-created questions that require resolving references and performing discrete operations like addition, counting, or sorting, demanding comprehensive paragraph understanding beyond paraphrase-and-entity-typing shortcuts.

    79.7%

    Self-reported