OpenAI Proprietary Released Jul 18, 2024 Updated
GPT-4o mini
ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.
Model summary
Summary
GPT-4o mini is OpenAI's model, released Jul 18, 2024. It's ranked in 2 categories and does best at text: #276 of 416, with a ToolsGuide Score of 180 against a median of 235.
It also ranks #134 of 167 for vision (206).
It has published results on 9 tests.
Specifications
- Creator
OpenAI- Licence
- Proprietary
- Released
- Jul 18, 2024
- Context window
- –
- Input price
- –
- Output price
- –
- Tests reported
- 9
- Settings ranked
- gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18, GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)
Model comparison
Against the ten best text models.
Text score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Vision score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Input price
USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better
Leaderboards
Where GPT-4o mini sits among the top 20 in each category.
Text
#276 of 416 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
Vision
#134 of 167 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
By task
Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.
Against its nearest rivals
Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values
-
GPT-4o mini -
claude-3-5-haiku-20241022 -
llama-3.1-70b-instruct
Text
gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18 · hover a bar for its rank
Vision
GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18) · hover a bar for its rank
Test results
Every test GPT-4o mini has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.
GPQA
#228 / 256Graduate-level science questions written to be hard to look up.
40.2%
Self-reported
SWE-Bench Verified
#120 / 120Fixing real bugs in real GitHub projects, checked by the projects' own tests.
8.7%
Self-reported
MMLU
#52 / 103Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
82.0%
Self-reported
MATH
#38 / 71MATH dataset contains 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions. Each problem includes full step-by-step solutions and spans multiple difficulty levels (1-5) across seven mathematical subjects including Prealgebra, Algebra, Number Theory, Counting and Probability, Geometry, Intermediate Algebra, and Precalculus.
70.2%
Self-reported
HumanEval
#29 / 66A benchmark that measures functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, consisting of 164 original programming problems assessing language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics
87.2%
Self-reported
MMMU
#48 / 66MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.
59.4%
Self-reported
MathVista
#31 / 40MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.
56.7%
Self-reported
MGSM
#13 / 31MGSM (Multilingual Grade School Math) is a benchmark of grade-school math problems. Contains 250 grade-school math problems manually translated from the GSM8K dataset into ten typologically diverse languages: Spanish, French, German, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Swahili, Bengali, and Telugu. Evaluates multilingual mathematical reasoning capabilities.
87.0%
Self-reported
DROP
#13 / 30DROP (Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs) is a reading comprehension benchmark requiring discrete reasoning over paragraph content. It contains crowdsourced, adversarially-created questions that require resolving references and performing discrete operations like addition, counting, or sorting, demanding comprehensive paragraph understanding beyond paraphrase-and-entity-typing shortcuts.
79.7%
Self-reported