OpenAI Proprietary Released Jan 14, 2026 Updated
GPT-5.2 Codex
ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.
Model summary
- Coding #104 / 147
265 / 1,000
ToolsGuide Score· votes 243, tests 301
- Price per 1M tokens
In $1.75· Out $14.00
$1.75
Input · median coding model $0.75
Summary
GPT-5.2 Codex is OpenAI's model, released Jan 14, 2026. It's ranked in 1 category and does best at coding: #104 of 147, with a ToolsGuide Score of 265 against a median of 316.
It costs $1.75 per million input tokens and $14.00 per million output tokens, about 2.3× the median coding model ($0.75).
It has published results on 3 tests.
Specifications
- Creator
OpenAI- Licence
- Proprietary
- Released
- Jan 14, 2026
- Context window
- 400K tokens
- Input price
- $1.75 / 1M
- Output price
- $14.00 / 1M
- Tests reported
- 3
- Settings ranked
- GPT-5.2-Codex
Model comparison
Against the ten best coding models.
Coding score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Input price
USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better
Leaderboards
Where GPT-5.2 Codex sits among the top 20 in each category.
Coding
#104 of 147 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
By task
Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.
Score against price
Coding · the 10 priced models ranked closest · up and to the left is better value
Coding
GPT-5.2-Codex · hover a bar for its rank
Test results
Every test GPT-5.2 Codex has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.
SWE-Bench Pro
#36 / 61Harder, longer software engineering tasks from real codebases.
56.4%
Self-reported · In the coding score
Terminal-Bench 2.0
#18 / 54Getting real work done in a command-line terminal.
64.0%
Self-reported
LiveBench
#17 / 38LiveBench is a challenging, contamination-limited LLM benchmark that addresses test set contamination by releasing new questions monthly based on recently-released datasets, arXiv papers, news articles, and IMDb movie synopses. It comprises tasks across math, coding, reasoning, language, instruction following, and data analysis with verifiable, objective ground-truth answers.
74.3%
Self-reported · In the text score