xAI Proprietary Released Nov 17, 2025 Updated
Grok-4.1
ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.
Model summary
Summary
Grok-4.1 is xAI's model, released Nov 17, 2025. It's ranked in 2 categories and does best at text: #54 of 416, with a ToolsGuide Score of 470 against a median of 235.
It also ranks #138 of 147 for coding (174).
Its text and coding score uses votes only, because it has published fewer than two of the tests used for those categories.
It has published results on 4 tests and has the top score on 1 of them, including FActScore.
Specifications
- Creator
- xAI
- Licence
- Proprietary
- Released
- Nov 17, 2025
- Context window
- –
- Input price
- –
- Output price
- –
- Tests reported
- 4
- Settings ranked
- grok-4.1-thinking, grok-4.1, Grok 4.1 (Thinking)
Model comparison
Against the ten best text models.
Text score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Coding score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Input price
USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better
Leaderboards
Where Grok-4.1 sits among the top 20 in each category.
Text
#54 of 416 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
Coding
#138 of 147 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
By task
Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.
Against its nearest rivals
Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values
- Grok-4.1
-
gemini-3-flash -
kimi-k2.6
Text
grok-4.1-thinking · hover a bar for its rank
Coding
Grok 4.1 (Thinking) · hover a bar for its rank
Test results
Every test Grok-4.1 has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.
Creative Writing v3
#7 / 14EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 is an LLM-judged creative writing benchmark that evaluates models across 32 writing prompts with 3 iterations per prompt. Uses a hybrid scoring system combining rubric assessment and Elo ratings through pairwise comparisons. Challenges models in areas like humor, romance, spatial awareness, and unique perspectives to assess emotional intelligence and creative writing capabilities.
85.4%
Self-reported
FActScore
#1 / 3A fine-grained atomic evaluation metric for factual precision in long-form text generation that breaks generated text into atomic facts and computes the percentage supported by reliable knowledge sources, with automated assessment using retrieval and language models
97.0%
Self-reported
EQ-Bench
#2 / 2EQ-Bench is an LLM-judged test evaluating active emotional intelligence abilities, understanding, insight, empathy, and interpersonal skills. The test set contains 45 challenging roleplay scenarios, most of which constitute pre-written prompts spanning 3 turns. The benchmark evaluates the performance of models by validating responses against several criteria and conducts pairwise comparisons to report a normalized Elo computation for each model.
79.3%
Unverified
LMArena Text Leaderboard
#2 / 2LMArena Text Leaderboard is a blind human preference evaluation benchmark that ranks models based on pairwise comparisons in real-world conversations. The leaderboard uses Elo ratings computed from user preferences in head-to-head model battles, providing a comprehensive measure of overall model capability and style.
73.3%
Unverified