Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Leaderboards

Where Llama 3.1 8B Instruct sits among the top 20 in each category.

By task

Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.

Test results

Every test Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.

• GPQA

  #246 / 256

  Graduate-level science questions written to be hard to look up.

  30.4%

  Self-reported

• MMLU-Pro

  #128 / 142

  Broad knowledge and reasoning across 14 subjects, ten answer choices each.

  48.3%

  Self-reported

• MMLU

  #87 / 103

  Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

  69.4%

  Self-reported

• IFEval

  #56 / 70

  Instruction-Following Evaluation (IFEval) benchmark for large language models, focusing on verifiable instructions with 25 types of instructions and around 500 prompts containing one or more verifiable constraints

  80.4%

  Self-reported

• HumanEval

  #54 / 66

  A benchmark that measures functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, consisting of 164 original programming problems assessing language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics

  72.6%

  Self-reported

• ARC-C

  #16 / 35

  The AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) Challenge Set is a multiple-choice question-answering benchmark containing grade-school level science questions that require advanced reasoning capabilities. ARC-C specifically contains questions that were answered incorrectly by both retrieval-based and word co-occurrence algorithms, making it a particularly challenging subset designed to test commonsense reasoning abilities in AI systems.

  83.4%

  Self-reported

• DROP

  #24 / 30

  DROP (Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs) is a reading comprehension benchmark requiring discrete reasoning over paragraph content. It contains crowdsourced, adversarially-created questions that require resolving references and performing discrete operations like addition, counting, or sorting, demanding comprehensive paragraph understanding beyond paraphrase-and-entity-typing shortcuts.

  59.5%

  Self-reported

• BFCL

  #3 / 11

  The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) is the first comprehensive and executable function call evaluation dedicated to assessing Large Language Models' ability to invoke functions. It evaluates serial and parallel function calls across multiple programming languages (Python, Java, JavaScript, REST API) using a novel Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) evaluation method. The benchmark consists of over 2,000 question-function-answer pairs covering diverse application domains and complex use cases including multiple function calls, parallel function calls, and multi-turn interactions.

  76.1%

  Self-reported

• MATH (CoT)

  #6 / 6

  MATH dataset contains 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions. Each problem includes full step-by-step solutions and spans multiple difficulty levels (1-5) across seven mathematical subjects. This variant uses Chain-of-Thought prompting to encourage step-by-step reasoning.

  51.9%

  Self-reported

• Nexus

  #3 / 4

  NexusRaven benchmark for evaluating function calling capabilities of large language models in zero-shot scenarios across cybersecurity tools and API interactions

  38.5%

  Self-reported

• API-Bank

  #3 / 3

  A comprehensive benchmark for tool-augmented LLMs that evaluates API planning, retrieval, and calling capabilities. Contains 314 tool-use dialogues with 753 API calls across 73 API tools, designed to assess how effectively LLMs can utilize external tools and overcome obstacles in tool leveraging.

  82.6%

  Self-reported

• Gorilla Benchmark API Bench

  #3 / 3

  APIBench, a comprehensive dataset of over 11,000 instruction-API pairs from HuggingFace, TorchHub, and TensorHub APIs for evaluating language models' ability to generate accurate API calls.

  8.2%

  Self-reported

• MMLU (CoT)

  #3 / 3

  Chain-of-Thought variant of the Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark, evaluating language models across 57 tasks including elementary mathematics, US history, computer science, law, and other professional and academic subjects. This version uses chain-of-thought prompting to elicit step-by-step reasoning.

  73.0%

  Self-reported

• Multilingual MGSM (CoT)

  #3 / 3

  Multilingual Grade School Math (MGSM) benchmark evaluates language models' chain-of-thought reasoning abilities across ten typologically diverse languages. Contains 250 grade-school math problems manually translated from GSM8K dataset into languages including Bengali and Swahili.

  68.9%

  Self-reported

• Multipl-E HumanEval

  #3 / 3

  MultiPL-E is a scalable and extensible approach to benchmarking neural code generation that translates unit test-driven code generation benchmarks across multiple programming languages. It extends the HumanEval benchmark to 18 additional programming languages, enabling evaluation of code generation models across diverse programming paradigms and providing insights into how models generalize programming knowledge across language boundaries.

  50.8%

  Self-reported

• Multipl-E MBPP

  #3 / 3

  MultiPL-E extends the Mostly Basic Python Problems (MBPP) benchmark to 18+ programming languages for evaluating multilingual code generation capabilities. MBPP contains 974 crowd-sourced programming problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers, covering programming fundamentals and standard library functionality. Each problem includes a task description, code solution, and automated test cases.

  52.4%

  Self-reported

• GSM-8K (CoT)

  #2 / 2

  Grade School Math 8K with Chain-of-Thought prompting, featuring 8.5K high-quality linguistically diverse grade school math word problems requiring multi-step reasoning and elementary arithmetic operations.

  84.5%

  Unverified

• MBPP EvalPlus (base)

  #1 / 1

  MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) is a benchmark of 974 crowd-sourced Python programming problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers. EvalPlus extends MBPP with significantly more test cases (35x) for more rigorous evaluation of LLM-synthesized code, providing high-quality and precise evaluation.

  72.8%

  Unverified