Skip to content

NVIDIA llama_3_1_community_license Released Oct 1, 2024 Updated

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.

Model summary

  • Text #295 / 416

    162 / 1,000

    ToolsGuide Score· votes 178, tests 149

  • Price per 1M tokens

    No listed price

Summary

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is NVIDIA's model, released Oct 1, 2024. It's ranked in 1 category and does best at text: #295 of 416, with a ToolsGuide Score of 162 against a median of 235.

It has published results on 11 tests and has the top score on 4 of them, including GSM8K Chat and Instruct HumanEval.

Specifications

Creator
NVIDIA
Licence
llama_3_1_community_license
Released
Oct 1, 2024
Context window
–
Input price
–
Output price
–
Tests reported
11
Settings ranked
llama-3.1-nemotron-70b-instruct

Model comparison

Against the ten best text models.

Text score

ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better

Input price

USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better

Leaderboards

Where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct sits among the top 20 in each category.

Text

#295 of 416 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model

Full text leaderboard →

By task

Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.

Against its nearest rivals

Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values

Text

llama-3.1-nemotron-70b-instruct · hover a bar for its rank

Test results

Every test Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.

  • MMLU

    #63 / 103

    Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

    80.2%

    Self-reported

  • GSM8k

    #23 / 48

    Grade School Math 8K, a dataset of 8.5K high-quality linguistically diverse grade school math word problems requiring multi-step reasoning and elementary arithmetic operations.

    91.4%

    Self-reported

  • ARC-C

    #24 / 35

    The AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) Challenge Set is a multiple-choice question-answering benchmark containing grade-school level science questions that require advanced reasoning capabilities. ARC-C specifically contains questions that were answered incorrectly by both retrieval-based and word co-occurrence algorithms, making it a particularly challenging subset designed to test commonsense reasoning abilities in AI systems.

    69.2%

    Self-reported

  • HellaSwag

    #13 / 28

    A challenging commonsense natural language inference dataset that uses Adversarial Filtering to create questions trivial for humans (>95% accuracy) but difficult for state-of-the-art models, requiring completion of sentence endings based on physical situations and everyday activities

    85.6%

    Self-reported

  • Winogrande

    #6 / 23

    WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at Scale. A large-scale dataset of 44,000 pronoun resolution problems designed to test machine commonsense reasoning. Uses adversarial filtering to reduce spurious biases and provides a more robust evaluation of whether AI systems truly understand commonsense or exploit statistical shortcuts. Current best AI methods achieve 59.4-79.1% accuracy, significantly below human performance of 94.0%.

    84.5%

    Self-reported

  • TruthfulQA

    #7 / 18

    TruthfulQA is a benchmark to measure whether language models are truthful in generating answers to questions. It comprises 817 questions that span 38 categories, including health, law, finance and politics. The questions are crafted such that some humans would answer falsely due to a false belief or misconception, testing models' ability to avoid generating false answers learned from human texts.

    58.6%

    Self-reported

  • MT-Bench

    #13 / 13

    MT-Bench is a challenging multi-turn benchmark that measures the ability of large language models to engage in coherent, informative, and engaging conversations. It uses strong LLMs as judges for scalable and explainable evaluation of multi-turn dialogue capabilities.

    0.1%

    Self-reported

  • GSM8K Chat

    #1 / 1

    Grade School Math 8K adapted for chat format evaluation, featuring 8.5K high-quality linguistically diverse grade school math word problems requiring multi-step reasoning and elementary arithmetic operations.

    81.9%

    Unverified

  • Instruct HumanEval

    #1 / 1

    Instruction-based variant of HumanEval benchmark for evaluating large language models' code generation capabilities with functional correctness using pass@k metric on programming problems

    73.8%

    Unverified

  • MMLU Chat

    #1 / 1

    Chat-format variant of the Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark, evaluating language models across 57 tasks including elementary mathematics, US history, computer science, law, and other professional and academic subjects. This version uses conversational prompting format for model evaluation.

    80.6%

    Unverified

  • XLSum English

    #1 / 1

    Large-scale multilingual abstractive summarization dataset comprising 1 million professionally annotated article-summary pairs from BBC, covering 44 languages. XL-Sum is highly abstractive, concise, and of high quality, designed to encourage research on multilingual abstractive summarization tasks.

    31.6%

    Unverified