Skip to content

NVIDIA llama_3_1_community_license Released Mar 18, 2025 Updated

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.

Model summary

  • Text #219 / 419

    229 / 1,000

    ToolsGuide Score· votes 200, tests 268

  • Price per 1M tokens

    No listed price

Summary

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is NVIDIA's model, released Mar 18, 2025. It's ranked in 1 category and does best at text: #219 of 419, with a ToolsGuide Score of 229 against a median of 252.

It has published results on 7 tests.

Specifications

Creator
NVIDIA
Licence
llama_3_1_community_license
Released
Mar 18, 2025
Context window
–
Input price
–
Output price
–
Tests reported
7
Settings ranked
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Model comparison

Against the ten best text models.

Text score

ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better

Input price

USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better

Leaderboards

Where Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 sits among the top 20 in each category.

Text

#219 of 419 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model

Full text leaderboard →

By task

Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.

Text

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 · hover a bar for its rank

Test results

Every test Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.

  • GPQA

    #169 / 265

    Graduate-level science questions written to be hard to look up.

    66.7%

    Self-reported

  • AIME 2025

    #106 / 124

    Competition maths problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Exam.

    58.4%

    Self-reported

  • MATH-500

    #13 / 34

    MATH-500 is a subset of the MATH dataset containing 500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions. Each problem includes full step-by-step solutions and spans multiple difficulty levels across seven mathematical subjects including Prealgebra, Algebra, Number Theory, Counting and Probability, Geometry, Intermediate Algebra, and Precalculus.

    96.6%

    Self-reported

  • MBPP

    #2 / 33

    MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) is a benchmark of 974 crowd-sourced Python programming problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers. Each problem consists of a task description, code solution, and 3 automated test cases covering programming fundamentals and standard library functionality.

    0.9%

    Self-reported

  • Arena Hard

    #5 / 27

    Arena-Hard-Auto is an automatic evaluation benchmark for instruction-tuned LLMs consisting of 500 challenging real-world prompts curated by BenchBuilder. It includes open-ended software engineering problems, mathematical questions, and creative writing tasks. The benchmark uses LLM-as-a-Judge methodology with GPT-4.1 and Gemini-2.5 as automatic judges to approximate human preference. Arena-Hard achieves 98.6% correlation with human preference rankings and provides 3x higher separation of model performances compared to MT-Bench, making it highly effective for distinguishing between models of similar quality.

    88.3%

    Self-reported

  • MT-Bench

    #4 / 13

    MT-Bench is a challenging multi-turn benchmark that measures the ability of large language models to engage in coherent, informative, and engaging conversations. It uses strong LLMs as judges for scalable and explainable evaluation of multi-turn dialogue capabilities.

    0.9%

    Self-reported

  • BFCL v2

    #3 / 5

    Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) v2 is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models' function calling capabilities. It features 2,251 question-function-answer pairs with enterprise and OSS-contributed functions, addressing data contamination and bias through live, user-contributed scenarios. The benchmark evaluates AST accuracy, executable accuracy, irrelevance detection, and relevance detection across multiple programming languages (Python, Java, JavaScript) and includes complex real-world function calling scenarios with multi-lingual prompts.

    73.7%

    Self-reported