Mistral apache_2_0 Released Jun 10, 2025 Updated
Magistral Medium
ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.
Model summary
- Text #243 / 419
215 / 1,000
ToolsGuide Score· votes 182, tests 262
- Price per 1M tokens
No listed price
Summary
Magistral Medium is Mistral's model, released Jun 10, 2025. It's ranked in 1 category and does best at text: #243 of 419, with a ToolsGuide Score of 215 against a median of 252.
It has published results on 6 tests.
Specifications
- Creator
Mistral
- Licence
- apache_2_0
- Released
- Jun 10, 2025
- Context window
- –
- Input price
- –
- Output price
- –
- Tests reported
- 6
- Settings ranked
- Magistral Medium (2506)
Model comparison
Against the ten best text models.
Text score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Input price
USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better
Leaderboards
Where Magistral Medium sits among the top 20 in each category.
Text
#243 of 419 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
By task
Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.
Against its nearest rivals
Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values
-
Magistral Medium
-
GPT-4 Turbo (2024-04-09) -
Claude 3.5 Haiku (20241022)
Text
Magistral Medium (2506) · hover a bar for its rank
Test results
Every test Magistral Medium has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.
GPQA
#152 / 265Graduate-level science questions written to be hard to look up.
70.8%
Self-reported
AIME 2025
#101 / 124Competition maths problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Exam.
64.9%
Self-reported
Humanity's Last Exam
#105 / 115Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions
9.0%
Self-reported · In the text score· In the vision score
LiveCodeBench
#48 / 77LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.
50.3%
Self-reported
AIME 2024
#37 / 54American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2024, consisting of 30 challenging mathematical reasoning problems from AIME I and AIME II competitions. Each problem requires an integer answer between 0-999 and tests advanced mathematical reasoning across algebra, geometry, combinatorics, and number theory. Used as a benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning capabilities in large language models at Olympiad-level difficulty.
73.6%
Self-reported
Aider-Polyglot
#18 / 22A coding benchmark that evaluates LLMs on 225 challenging Exercism programming exercises across C++, Go, Java, JavaScript, Python, and Rust. Models receive two attempts to solve each problem, with test error feedback provided after the first attempt if it fails. The benchmark measures both initial problem-solving ability and capacity to edit code based on error feedback, providing an end-to-end evaluation of code generation and editing capabilities across multiple programming languages.
47.1%
Self-reported