Meta muse_model_license Released Oct 15, 2026 Updated
Muse Spark Open
ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.
Model summary
- Coding #52 / 147
386 / 1,000
ToolsGuide Score· votes 382, tests 389
- Price per 1M tokens
In $1.25· Out $4.25
$1.25
Input · median coding model $0.75
Summary
Muse Spark Open is Meta's model, released Oct 15, 2026. It's ranked in 1 category and does best at coding: #52 of 147, with a ToolsGuide Score of 386 against a median of 316.
It costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens, about 1.7× the median coding model ($0.75).
It has published results on 17 tests and has the top score on 1 of them, including MCP Atlas.
Specifications
- Creator
Meta
- Licence
- muse_model_license
- Released
- Oct 15, 2026
- Context window
- 1M tokens
- Input price
- $1.25 / 1M
- Output price
- $4.25 / 1M
- Tests reported
- 17
- Settings ranked
- Muse Spark Open (Max)
Model comparison
Against the ten best coding models.
Coding score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Input price
USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better
Leaderboards
Where Muse Spark Open sits among the top 20 in each category.
Coding
#52 of 147 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
By task
Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.
Score against price
Coding · the 10 priced models ranked closest · up and to the left is better value
Coding
Muse Spark Open (Max) · hover a bar for its rank
Test results
Every test Muse Spark Open has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.
GPQA
#35 / 256Graduate-level science questions written to be hard to look up.
89.0%
Self-reported
DeepSWE 1.1
#33 / 50DeepSWE 1.1 evaluates software engineering agents using the mini-swe-agent harness.
60.0%
Self-reported · In the coding score
Terminal-Bench 2.1
#25 / 46Terminal-Bench 2.1 is an updated release of the Terminal-Bench benchmark that tests AI agents' ability to operate a computer via the terminal. It evaluates how well models handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, data science workflows, and security tasks.
76.4%
Self-reported
MCP Atlas
#1 / 38MCP Atlas is a benchmark for evaluating AI models on scaled tool use capabilities, measuring how well models can coordinate and utilize multiple tools across complex multi-step tasks.
89.2%
Self-reported
SciCode
#4 / 30SciCode is a research coding benchmark curated by scientists that challenges language models to code solutions for scientific problems. It contains 338 subproblems decomposed from 80 challenging main problems across 16 natural science sub-fields including mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, and materials science. Problems require knowledge recall, reasoning, and code synthesis skills.
58.5%
Self-reported
OSWorld-Verified
#10 / 28OSWorld-Verified is a verified subset of OSWorld, a scalable real computer environment for multimodal agents supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS.
80.4%
Self-reported
SimpleVQA
#5 / 17SimpleVQA is a visual question answering benchmark focused on simple queries.
0.7%
Self-reported
BabyVision
#6 / 16A benchmark for early-stage visual reasoning and perception on child-like vision tasks.
80.2%
Self-reported
ZEROBench
#3 / 15ZEROBench is a challenging vision benchmark designed to test models on zero-shot visual understanding tasks.
0.5%
Self-reported
GDPval-AA
#9 / 14GDPval-AA evaluates AI agents on economically valuable professional knowledge-work tasks and reports performance as an Elo score.
46.7%
Self-reported
Artificial Analysis
#13 / 13Artificial Analysis benchmark evaluates AI models across quality, speed, and pricing dimensions, providing a composite assessment of model capabilities for real-world usage.
39.0%
Self-reported
Job Bench
#2 / 9Job Bench evaluates AI agents on realistic professional tasks that require multi-step planning, research, and production of work artifacts.
61.8%
Self-reported
WorldVQA
#4 / 7WorldVQA is a benchmark designed to evaluate atomic vision-centric world knowledge. It assesses models' ability to understand and reason about visual elements representing real-world knowledge.
49.4%
Self-reported
SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA
#3 / 5SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA evaluates a model's ability to answer questions about real codebases, measuring repository-level comprehension and the ability to reason about code structure, behavior, and intent across an entire project.
58.0%
Self-reported
Toolathlon-Verified
#5 / 5Verified Toolathlon evaluation of agent tool-use capability, as reported in the MiMo-V2.6 release.
72.8%
Self-reported
AA-Omniscience Index
#2 / 4AA-Omniscience Index is Artificial Analysis's knowledge-reliability metric. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and does not penalize abstention. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers.
12.5%
Self-reported
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)
#3 / 4Full multimodal Humanity's Last Exam evaluated with tool use enabled, distinct from its text-only subset.
61.0%
Self-reported