Skip to content

Microsoft mit Released Aug 23, 2024 Updated

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.

Model summary

  • Vision #159 / 167

    133 / 1,000

    ToolsGuide Score· votes 107, tests 165

  • Price per 1M tokens

    No listed price

Summary

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is Microsoft's model, released Aug 23, 2024. It's ranked in 1 category and does best at vision: #159 of 167, with a ToolsGuide Score of 133 against a median of 346.

It has published results on 9 tests and has the top score on 1 of them, including ScienceQA.

Specifications

Creator
Microsoft
Licence
mit
Released
Aug 23, 2024
Context window
–
Input price
–
Output price
–
Tests reported
9
Settings ranked
Phi-3.5 Vision Instruct

Model comparison

Against the ten best vision models.

Vision score

ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better

Input price

USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better

Leaderboards

Where Phi-3.5-vision-instruct sits among the top 20 in each category.

Vision

#159 of 167 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model

Full vision leaderboard →

By task

Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.

Vision

Phi-3.5 Vision Instruct · hover a bar for its rank

Test results

Every test Phi-3.5-vision-instruct has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.

  • MMMU

    #64 / 66

    MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.

    43.0%

    Self-reported

  • MathVista

    #39 / 40

    MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.

    43.9%

    Self-reported

  • AI2D

    #32 / 35

    AI2D is a dataset of 4,903 illustrative diagrams from grade school natural sciences (such as food webs, human physiology, and life cycles) with over 15,000 multiple choice questions and answers. The benchmark evaluates diagram understanding and visual reasoning capabilities, requiring models to interpret diagrammatic elements, relationships, and structure to answer questions about scientific concepts represented in visual form.

    78.1%

    Self-reported

  • ChartQA

    #17 / 26

    ChartQA is a large-scale benchmark comprising 9.6K human-written questions and 23.1K questions generated from human-written chart summaries, designed to evaluate models' abilities in visual and logical reasoning over charts.

    81.8%

    Self-reported

  • TextVQA

    #13 / 16

    TextVQA contains 45,336 questions on 28,408 images that require reasoning about text to answer. Introduced to benchmark VQA models' ability to read and reason about text within images, particularly for assistive technologies for visually impaired users. The dataset addresses the gap where existing VQA datasets had few text-based questions or were too small.

    72.0%

    Self-reported

  • MMBench

    #6 / 9

    A bilingual benchmark for assessing multi-modal capabilities of vision-language models through multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese, providing systematic evaluation across diverse vision-language tasks with robust metrics.

    81.9%

    Self-reported

  • POPE

    #2 / 3

    Polling-based Object Probing Evaluation (POPE) is a benchmark for evaluating object hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). POPE addresses the problem where LVLMs generate objects inconsistent with target images by using a polling-based query method that asks yes/no questions about object presence in images, providing more stable and flexible evaluation of object hallucination.

    86.1%

    Self-reported

  • InterGPS

    #2 / 2

    Interpretable Geometry Problem Solver (Inter-GPS) with Geometry3K dataset of 3,002 geometry problems with dense annotation in formal language using theorem knowledge and symbolic reasoning

    36.3%

    Unverified

  • ScienceQA

    #1 / 1

    ScienceQA is the first large-scale multimodal science question answering benchmark with 21,208 multiple-choice questions covering 3 subjects (natural science, language science, social science), 26 topics, 127 categories, and 379 skills. The benchmark includes both text and image modalities, featuring detailed explanations and Chain-of-Thought reasoning to diagnose multi-hop reasoning ability.

    91.3%

    Unverified