Qwen tongyi_qianwen Released Aug 29, 2024 Updated
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.
Model summary
- Vision #133 / 167
207 / 1,000
ToolsGuide Score· votes 197, tests 217
- Price per 1M tokens
No listed price
Summary
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct is Qwen's model, released Aug 29, 2024. It's ranked in 1 category and does best at vision: #133 of 167, with a ToolsGuide Score of 207 against a median of 346.
It has published results on 15 tests and has the top score on 4 of them, including TextVQA and EgoSchema.
Specifications
- Creator
Qwen- Licence
- tongyi_qianwen
- Released
- Aug 29, 2024
- Context window
- –
- Input price
- –
- Output price
- –
- Tests reported
- 15
- Settings ranked
- Qwen2-VL-72B
Model comparison
Against the ten best vision models.
Vision score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Input price
USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better
Leaderboards
Where Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct sits among the top 20 in each category.
Vision
#133 of 167 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
By task
Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.
Vision
Qwen2-VL-72B · hover a bar for its rank
Test results
Every test Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.
MMMU-Pro
#66 / 73College-level questions that need both an image and text to answer.
46.2%
Self-reported · In the vision score
RealWorldQA
#19 / 32RealWorldQA is a benchmark designed to evaluate basic real-world spatial understanding capabilities of multimodal models. The initial release consists of over 700 anonymized images taken from vehicles and other real-world scenarios, each accompanied by a question and easily verifiable answer. Released by xAI as part of their Grok-1.5 Vision preview to test models' ability to understand natural scenes and spatial relationships in everyday visual contexts.
77.8%
Self-reported
ChartQA
#6 / 26ChartQA is a large-scale benchmark comprising 9.6K human-written questions and 23.1K questions generated from human-written chart summaries, designed to evaluate models' abilities in visual and logical reasoning over charts.
88.3%
Self-reported
MathVista-Mini
#21 / 26MathVista-Mini is a smaller version of the MathVista benchmark that evaluates mathematical reasoning in visual contexts. It consists of examples derived from multimodal datasets involving mathematics, combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess foundation models' ability to solve problems requiring both visual understanding and mathematical reasoning.
70.5%
Self-reported
OCRBench
#12 / 24OCRBench: Comprehensive evaluation benchmark for assessing Optical Character Recognition (OCR) capabilities in Large Multimodal Models across text recognition, scene text VQA, and document understanding tasks
87.7%
Self-reported
MVBench
#7 / 18A comprehensive multi-modal video understanding benchmark covering 20 challenging video tasks that require temporal understanding beyond single-frame analysis. Tasks span from perception to cognition, including action recognition, temporal reasoning, spatial reasoning, object interaction, scene transition, and counterfactual inference. Uses a novel static-to-dynamic method to systematically generate video tasks from existing annotations.
73.6%
Self-reported
TextVQA
#1 / 16TextVQA contains 45,336 questions on 28,408 images that require reasoning about text to answer. Introduced to benchmark VQA models' ability to read and reason about text within images, particularly for assistive technologies for visually impaired users. The dataset addresses the gap where existing VQA datasets had few text-based questions or were too small.
85.5%
Self-reported
InfoVQAtest
#8 / 12InfoVQA test set with infographic images requiring joint reasoning over document layout, textual content, graphical elements, and data visualizations with elementary reasoning and arithmetic skills
84.5%
Self-reported
DocVQAtest
#3 / 11DocVQA is a Visual Question Answering benchmark on document images containing 50,000 questions defined on 12,000+ document images. The benchmark focuses on understanding document structure and content to answer questions about various document types including letters, memos, notes, and reports from the UCSF Industry Documents Library.
96.5%
Self-reported
EgoSchema
#1 / 9A diagnostic benchmark for very long-form video language understanding consisting of over 5000 human curated multiple choice questions based on 3-minute video clips from Ego4D, covering a broad range of natural human activities and behaviors
77.9%
Self-reported
MMBench
#4 / 9A bilingual benchmark for assessing multi-modal capabilities of vision-language models through multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese, providing systematic evaluation across diverse vision-language tasks with robust metrics.
86.5%
Self-reported
MMMUval
#4 / 4Validation set for MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning) benchmark, designed to evaluate multimodal models on massive multi-discipline tasks demanding college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning across Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering.
64.5%
Self-reported
MTVQA
#2 / 2MTVQA (Multilingual Text-Centric Visual Question Answering) is the first benchmark featuring high-quality human expert annotations across 9 diverse languages, consisting of 6,778 question-answer pairs across 2,116 images. It addresses visual-textual misalignment problems in multilingual text-centric VQA.
30.9%
Unverified
MMVetGPT4Turbo
#1 / 1MM-Vet evaluation using GPT-4 Turbo for scoring. This variant of MM-Vet examines large multimodal models on complicated multimodal tasks requiring integrated capabilities across six core vision-language abilities: recognition, knowledge, spatial awareness, language generation, OCR, and math.
74.0%
Unverified
VCR_en_easy
#1 / 1Visual Commonsense Reasoning (VCR) benchmark that tests higher-order cognition and commonsense reasoning beyond simple object recognition. Models must answer challenging questions about images and provide rationales justifying their answers. The benchmark measures the ability to infer people's actions, goals, and mental states from visual context.
91.9%
Unverified