Qwen apache_2_0 Released Mar 5, 2025 Updated
QwQ-32B
ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.
Model summary
- Text #230 / 416
209 / 1,000
ToolsGuide Score· votes 208, tests 211
- Price per 1M tokens
No listed price
Summary
QwQ-32B is Qwen's model, released Mar 5, 2025. It's ranked in 1 category and does best at text: #230 of 416, with a ToolsGuide Score of 209 against a median of 235.
It has published results on 7 tests.
Specifications
- Creator
Qwen- Licence
- apache_2_0
- Released
- Mar 5, 2025
- Context window
- –
- Input price
- –
- Output price
- –
- Tests reported
- 7
- Settings ranked
- qwq-32b
Model comparison
Against the ten best text models.
Text score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Input price
USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better
Leaderboards
Where QwQ-32B sits among the top 20 in each category.
Text
#230 of 416 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
By task
Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.
Against its nearest rivals
Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values
Text
qwq-32b · hover a bar for its rank
Test results
Every test QwQ-32B has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.
GPQA
#168 / 256Graduate-level science questions written to be hard to look up.
65.2%
Self-reported
LiveCodeBench
#33 / 76LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.
63.4%
Self-reported
IFEval
#46 / 70Instruction-Following Evaluation (IFEval) benchmark for large language models, focusing on verifiable instructions with 25 types of instructions and around 500 prompts containing one or more verifiable constraints
83.9%
Self-reported
AIME 2024
#31 / 54American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2024, consisting of 30 challenging mathematical reasoning problems from AIME I and AIME II competitions. Each problem requires an integer answer between 0-999 and tests advanced mathematical reasoning across algebra, geometry, combinatorics, and number theory. Used as a benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning capabilities in large language models at Olympiad-level difficulty.
79.5%
Self-reported
LiveBench
#22 / 38LiveBench is a challenging, contamination-limited LLM benchmark that addresses test set contamination by releasing new questions monthly based on recently-released datasets, arXiv papers, news articles, and IMDb movie synopses. It comprises tasks across math, coding, reasoning, language, instruction following, and data analysis with verifiable, objective ground-truth answers.
73.1%
Self-reported · In the text score
MATH-500
#26 / 34MATH-500 is a subset of the MATH dataset containing 500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions. Each problem includes full step-by-step solutions and spans multiple difficulty levels across seven mathematical subjects including Prealgebra, Algebra, Number Theory, Counting and Probability, Geometry, Intermediate Algebra, and Precalculus.
90.6%
Self-reported
BFCL
#10 / 11The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) is the first comprehensive and executable function call evaluation dedicated to assessing Large Language Models' ability to invoke functions. It evaluates serial and parallel function calls across multiple programming languages (Python, Java, JavaScript, REST API) using a novel Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) evaluation method. The benchmark consists of over 2,000 question-function-answer pairs covering diverse application domains and complex use cases including multiple function calls, parallel function calls, and multi-turn interactions.
66.4%
Self-reported