# Make review

> More control than Zapier for complex workflows, at a lower price per action.

- Usefulness: 9/10 (how much value it creates)
- Ease of use: Needs some skill (blue): Expect a learning curve or some technical setup.
- Price: Free plan available (checked October 22, 2026)
- Best for: Builders who want detailed control over multi-step workflows
- Not for: People who want to set up a simple automation in two minutes
- How we evaluated it: Research-based review: documentation, pricing, demos and public user feedback.
- Published: October 22, 2026; updated: October 22, 2026

Make suits automations with branches, loops and data shaping. The free plan includes 1,000 credits a month; Core, Pro and Teams plans add credits and features.

## Pros

- Visual canvas shows the whole workflow
- Routers, filters and iterators for complex logic
- Credits go further than per-task pricing
- Free plan with no time limit

## Cons

- Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- Credit costs vary by action and AI use
- Fewer ready-made integrations than Zapier

Make suits automations with branches, loops and data shaping. The free plan includes 1,000 credits a month; Core, Pro and Teams plans add credits and features.

Make (formerly Integromat) builds automations as visual scenarios: modules connected on a canvas, with routers, filters and iterators for branching logic. Billing is by credits, and most actions use one credit.

## Sources

- [Make pricing and subscription packages](https://www.make.com/en/pricing): Plans and prices (checked October 22, 2026)


---
Source: https://toolsguide.net/reviews/make · Tools Guide (https://toolsguide.net). Prices in US dollars.
