Anthropic Proprietary Released Feb 29, 2024 Updated
Claude 3 Sonnet
ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.
Model summary
Summary
Claude 3 Sonnet is Anthropic's model, released Feb 29, 2024. It's ranked in 2 categories and does best at text: #293 of 416, with a ToolsGuide Score of 164 against a median of 235.
It also ranks #150 of 167 for vision (154).
Its vision score uses votes only, because it has published fewer than two of the tests used for that category.
It has published results on 11 tests.
Specifications
- Creator
Anthropic- Licence
- Proprietary
- Released
- Feb 29, 2024
- Context window
- –
- Input price
- –
- Output price
- –
- Tests reported
- 11
- Settings ranked
- claude-3-sonnet-20240229, Claude 3 Sonnet (20240229)
Model comparison
Against the ten best text models.
Text score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Vision score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Input price
USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better
Leaderboards
Where Claude 3 Sonnet sits among the top 20 in each category.
Text
#293 of 416 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
Vision
#150 of 167 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
By task
Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.
Against its nearest rivals
Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values
-
Claude 3 Sonnet -
jamba-1.5-large -
llama-3.1-nemotron-70b-instruct
Text
claude-3-sonnet-20240229 · hover a bar for its rank
Vision
Claude 3 Sonnet (20240229) · hover a bar for its rank
Test results
Every test Claude 3 Sonnet has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.
GPQA
#226 / 256Graduate-level science questions written to be hard to look up.
40.4%
Self-reported
MMLU-Pro
#117 / 142Broad knowledge and reasoning across 14 subjects, ten answer choices each.
56.8%
Self-reported
MMLU
#69 / 103Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
79.0%
Self-reported
MATH
#63 / 71MATH dataset contains 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions. Each problem includes full step-by-step solutions and spans multiple difficulty levels (1-5) across seven mathematical subjects including Prealgebra, Algebra, Number Theory, Counting and Probability, Geometry, Intermediate Algebra, and Precalculus.
43.1%
Self-reported
HumanEval
#53 / 66A benchmark that measures functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, consisting of 164 original programming problems assessing language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics
73.0%
Self-reported
GSM8k
#19 / 48Grade School Math 8K, a dataset of 8.5K high-quality linguistically diverse grade school math word problems requiring multi-step reasoning and elementary arithmetic operations.
92.3%
Self-reported
ARC-C
#6 / 35The AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) Challenge Set is a multiple-choice question-answering benchmark containing grade-school level science questions that require advanced reasoning capabilities. ARC-C specifically contains questions that were answered incorrectly by both retrieval-based and word co-occurrence algorithms, making it a particularly challenging subset designed to test commonsense reasoning abilities in AI systems.
93.2%
Self-reported
MGSM
#17 / 31MGSM (Multilingual Grade School Math) is a benchmark of grade-school math problems. Contains 250 grade-school math problems manually translated from the GSM8K dataset into ten typologically diverse languages: Spanish, French, German, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Swahili, Bengali, and Telugu. Evaluates multilingual mathematical reasoning capabilities.
83.5%
Self-reported
DROP
#17 / 30DROP (Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs) is a reading comprehension benchmark requiring discrete reasoning over paragraph content. It contains crowdsourced, adversarially-created questions that require resolving references and performing discrete operations like addition, counting, or sorting, demanding comprehensive paragraph understanding beyond paraphrase-and-entity-typing shortcuts.
78.9%
Self-reported
HellaSwag
#6 / 28A challenging commonsense natural language inference dataset that uses Adversarial Filtering to create questions trivial for humans (>95% accuracy) but difficult for state-of-the-art models, requiring completion of sentence endings based on physical situations and everyday activities
89.0%
Self-reported
BIG-Bench Hard
#8 / 21BIG-Bench Hard (BBH) is a subset of 23 challenging BIG-Bench tasks selected because prior language model evaluations did not outperform average human-rater performance. The benchmark contains 6,511 evaluation examples testing various forms of multi-step reasoning including arithmetic, logical reasoning (Boolean expressions, logical deduction), geometric reasoning, temporal reasoning, and language understanding. Tasks require capabilities such as causal judgment, object counting, navigation, pattern recognition, and complex problem solving.
82.9%
Self-reported