Google Proprietary Released Jun 26, 2025 Updated
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
ToolsGuide Scores, rankings, test results and price.
Model summary
- Text #313 / 416
145 / 1,000
ToolsGuide Score· votes 192, tests 116
- Price per 1M tokens
No listed price
Summary
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is Google's model, released Jun 26, 2025. It's ranked in 1 category and does best at text: #313 of 416, with a ToolsGuide Score of 145 against a median of 235.
It has published results on 18 tests and has the top score on 3 of them, including ECLeKTic and Codegolf v2.2.
Specifications
- Creator
Google
- Licence
- Proprietary
- Released
- Jun 26, 2025
- Context window
- –
- Input price
- –
- Output price
- –
- Tests reported
- 18
- Settings ranked
- gemma-3n-e4b-it
Model comparison
Against the ten best text models.
Text score
ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000 · Higher is better
Input price
USD per 1M input tokens · Lower is better
Leaderboards
Where Gemma 3n E4B Instructed sits among the top 20 in each category.
Text
#313 of 416 · ToolsGuide Score out of 1,000, where 1,000 is a flawless model
By task
Scored from votes on each kind of prompt alone, on the same 1,000-point scale.
Against its nearest rivals
Text prompts by kind · ToolsGuide Score from votes · hover for values
-
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
-
claude-3-haiku-20240307 -
qwq-32b-preview
Text
gemma-3n-e4b-it · hover a bar for its rank
Test results
Every test Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a published result on, out of 100%, with its rank among the models that took it.
GPQA
#253 / 256Graduate-level science questions written to be hard to look up.
23.7%
Self-reported
MMLU-Pro
#125 / 142Broad knowledge and reasoning across 14 subjects, ten answer choices each.
50.6%
Self-reported
AIME 2025
#120 / 123Competition maths problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Exam.
11.6%
Self-reported
MMLU
#95 / 103Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
64.9%
Self-reported
LiveCodeBench
#71 / 76LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.
13.2%
Self-reported
HumanEval
#49 / 66A benchmark that measures functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, consisting of 164 original programming problems assessing language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics
75.0%
Self-reported
MBPP
#26 / 33MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) is a benchmark of 974 crowd-sourced Python programming problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers. Each problem consists of a task description, code solution, and 3 automated test cases covering programming fundamentals and standard library functionality.
0.6%
Self-reported
MMLU-ProX
#29 / 32Extended version of MMLU-Pro providing additional challenging multiple-choice questions for evaluating language models across diverse academic and professional domains. Built on the foundation of the Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark framework.
19.9%
Self-reported
Include
#26 / 31Include benchmark - specific documentation not found in official sources
57.2%
Self-reported
MGSM
#23 / 31MGSM (Multilingual Grade School Math) is a benchmark of grade-school math problems. Contains 250 grade-school math problems manually translated from the GSM8K dataset into ten typologically diverse languages: Spanish, French, German, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Swahili, Bengali, and Telugu. Evaluates multilingual mathematical reasoning capabilities.
67.0%
Self-reported
WMT24++
#17 / 24WMT24++ is a comprehensive multilingual machine translation benchmark that expands the WMT24 dataset to cover 55 languages and dialects. It includes human-written references and post-edits across four domains (literary, news, social, and speech) to evaluate machine translation systems and large language models across diverse linguistic contexts.
50.1%
Self-reported
Global-MMLU-Lite
#11 / 16A lightweight version of Global MMLU benchmark that evaluates language models across multiple languages while addressing cultural and linguistic biases in multilingual evaluation.
64.5%
Self-reported
HiddenMath
#8 / 13Google DeepMind's internal mathematical reasoning benchmark that introduces novel problems not encountered during model training to evaluate true mathematical reasoning capabilities rather than memorization
37.7%
Self-reported
LiveCodeBench v5
#6 / 9LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.
25.7%
Self-reported
ECLeKTic
#1 / 8A multilingual closed-book question answering dataset that evaluates cross-lingual knowledge transfer in large language models across 12 languages, using knowledge-seeking questions based on Wikipedia articles that exist only in one language
19.0%
Self-reported
Global-MMLU
#5 / 8A comprehensive multilingual benchmark covering 42 languages that addresses cultural and linguistic biases in evaluation, with improved translation quality and culturally sensitive question subsets.
60.3%
Self-reported
Codegolf v2.2
#1 / 4Codegolf v2.2 benchmark
16.8%
Self-reported
OpenAI MMLU
#1 / 2MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) is a comprehensive benchmark that measures a text model's multitask accuracy across 57 diverse academic and professional subjects. The test covers elementary mathematics, US history, computer science, law, morality, business ethics, clinical knowledge, and many other domains spanning STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional fields. To attain high accuracy, models must possess extensive world knowledge and problem-solving ability.
35.6%
Unverified